NewspaperCrane
Well-Known Member
"There can be no interference with the internal development of alien civilizations."Explain, my pizza-eating otaku not-my-bro.
"There can be no interference with the internal development of alien civilizations."Explain, my pizza-eating otaku not-my-bro.
Crane... At the risk of making myself sound naive... But you are making less sense then the time you made up 'blueturple'."There can be no interference with the internal development of alien civilizations."
You fail at google-fu. And for the recrod, Nuron made up booturple. I made up Blueturple, while I was half a sleep on mumble.Crane... At the risk of making myself sound naive... But you are making less sense then the time you made up 'booturple'.
I was always more of a Star Wars guy then a Trekkie.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Federation_of_PlanetsI was always more of a Star Wars guy then a Trekkie.
Anyway, I don't have time to go to Google and Wikipedia! There's points to capture!
And I hardly see how this 'Prime Directive' has anything to do with the Federation.
And anyway, you should know by now that I meddle in everyone's business anyway.
I'm a Pyro.
Let's get back on topic.
How long have you been with T9K?: A year or something.
Why do you want to join the WorldGuard?: I love the experience of fighting for live. That's why I am Diamond Miner of the Federation, and when I am needed I want to escort valuables with my life.
What Federation city are you part of?: WorldHub. I'm the Director of Fun in Vorsprung's office.
Do you agree to follow all rules? Yesh!
Application form!
How long have you been with T9K?: Since before minecraft classic was on t9k
Why do you want to join the WorldGuard?: I normally don't mind escort quests, also my character, my skin is based off of, loves the orderly diplomacy of law, also keeps me off skyrim.
What Federation city are you part of?: None, was part of Ollee's city in the last towny server
Do you agree to follow all rules? Yes
I find it pretty disturbing what i have to read here. The fact that you're planning on claiming land around cities you don't approve of is clearly a threat to grief other people. not to mention Ustulo's proposal... And yes I say griefing: Wikipedia says: "Griefing is the act of chronically causing grief to other members of an online community, or more specifically, intentionally disrupting the immersion of another player in their gameplay."
That's exactly what you're planning to do. And what committee is it that's deciding who "nearly EVERYBODY in the Federation (and on the server in general)" wants to be griefed by you? Surely not you, you guys are NOT the elected Police of this server. That's still the admins, and they have been doing a decent job in that aspect lately. If you have a different opinion, BAAW somewhere else, but if you're gonna interfere with my gameplay that way I'm gonna file a ban request. Period.
Here ya go, thelolwut?
can someone make a short version of the 3 posts above me?
i can't read walls
Here ya go, theversions of those posts.![]()
Dein: You guys are stupid, saying that you'll build stuff outisde people's cities to punish them for attacking or griefing you. Don't build stuff around the walls of your enemies, that's griefing. Otherwise I'm gonna try to get you banned
Lavar: Dein, if you attack us first, we'll get you back, so it's not our fault in the first place. I also think that we're hypocrites, because we grief people who grief us. I think we should tone down the way we punish people or else we will look bad.
Bbgunshot: I like the Nether and I'm making an organization there. Let's be allies.

@DutchCheese: People should seek other means of communication than text if they get confused by more than 3 sentences.
@lacar: I totally see the point, they're trying to make. BUT I'm absolutely not OK, with the way they arrogate themselves the function to decide when "everybody on the server" approves a grief. Considering their decision to put that passus in their constitution, I don't feel like we're dealing with the wisest of fellows here. So their decisionmaking about who's a bad guy is likely not going to be the best, either. To be blunt: They are by no means qualified to make such judgement.
In fact I find it adorable, almost ridiculous what they're trying to pull off here. As I already stated, such action will never be necessary the way it's menat to, since admins tend to react real quick lately. But IF it's going to happen, I predict it's going to happen not more than once (getting through more than one appeal is pretty unlikely). So you'd rather scratch it from your constitution.