Image Thread
- Thread starter rileyper
- Start date
TheGurw
Well-Known Member
I assume by your lack of direct response, and also the font changes between pictures, that these are not officially endorsed.
pictures
csimiami14
Well-Known Member
TheGurw
Well-Known Member
saawe trhat earlire. btu thhnaks wyanya.
Patchouli
Well-Known Member
Guess who was drunk?
TheGurw
Well-Known Member
Dutchy?
DutchCheese
Well-Known Member
I deny nor confirm any statement
TheGurw
Well-Known Member
You're still a better DrunkCheese than I will ever be a DrunkGurw.
And if that sentence makes sense to anyone, kindly explain it to me. I confused myself.
TheGurw
Well-Known Member
reminds me of this xkcd comic:
COmplains, Complains everywhere! thats Everything Parents do!! Complain. atleast when there Children are around.....
(original link: http://xkcd.com/1227/)
TheGurw
Well-Known Member
So I was just made aware that this image is making the rounds on several media sites, such as reddit/imgur, facebook, funnyjunk, etc.
It is a fake.
That QR code links to the following document, which if you open it, you can see is plainly labeled A/CN.10/L.70 - not the same reference number. There's some other things:
1. The letterhead and other formatting is completely different.
2. This document looks like nearly all of it was put in with photoshop, rather than typed into an original document.
3. The UN doesn't use coloured letterhead for intra-office documents.
So in the end, it would appear that this is a fake; even if it looks very official to anyone who doesn't do their own research. Cheers.
http://undocs.org/A/CN.10/L.70
It is a fake.
That QR code links to the following document, which if you open it, you can see is plainly labeled A/CN.10/L.70 - not the same reference number. There's some other things:
1. The letterhead and other formatting is completely different.
2. This document looks like nearly all of it was put in with photoshop, rather than typed into an original document.
3. The UN doesn't use coloured letterhead for intra-office documents.
So in the end, it would appear that this is a fake; even if it looks very official to anyone who doesn't do their own research. Cheers.
http://undocs.org/A/CN.10/L.70
