• You're viewing the Team9000 Archives. These old threads are closed to new comments, but if something interests you or you have a question, feel free to open a new thread in the main forums.

They Are All Liars!

dude i couldnt even finish watching it
im just so goddamn tired of all these unpatriotic bastards and all these goddamn government coverups
im getting ready to move to canada
its just pure bull****
like c0c0 said
 
um what does it matter if it was a plane or a missile? it was destroyed either way. why would the government lie anyways?
 
Sabotage...it is a good thing I've never liked you.

How do you come to the conclusion that it wasn't a plane?

First off, Have you ever heard of Tricaster? Photoshop?

Second off, the tapes were not ****ing confiscated you dumbass. They are considered evidence. If your neighbors house got broken into, and you have a camera (that belongs to you) recording your house the film can be taken as evidence in hopes to find who did it. In this case, the films were taken to help connect the 3 other hijacking to this one. If there are places filming the Pentagon and something ****ing crashes into it, of couse the tapes are going to be taken.

Try this on for size. I did watch this whole thing so don't throw **** that wasn't in this film at me. Correct me if I am wrong but if a why would a gas station have a security camera? To keep people from stealing gas! To find people that go inside and rob the place. What are the odds this gas station camera was pointed in the general direction of the pentagon much less at the spot plane hit.

Same story with the hotel camera. The fact that it's on the roof has nothing to do with anything. It serves the same purpose as all security cameras. To protect it's building.

Also, if you watched it says flight 77 was 2ft above the ground at before it hit the pentagon. Which, is indeed true, but they use this same information on retards (such as yourself) and say the plane was ALSO 2ft above the highway miles away from the pentagon. Which, is in fact very false. If you also read, the tape never said the highway video was taken...It just goes...This footage has never been released.

Please shut the **** up trying to get every 9 year old gullable gay boy to believe you and do some reseach and use your damn head before posting.
 
Big Plane, Small Holes
CLAIM: Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building's exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon's middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?" asks reopen911.org, a Web site "dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001."

The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile--part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. "This attack," he writes, "could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel."

FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.

Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."

The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide--not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.





HOLE TRUTH: Flight 77’s landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon’s Ring C. PHOTOGRAPH BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Intact Windows
CLAIM: Many Pentagon windows remained in one piece--even those just above the point of impact from the Boeing 757 passenger plane. Pentagonstrike.co.uk, an online animation widely circulated in the United States and Europe, claims that photographs showing "intact windows" directly above the crash site prove "a missile" or "a craft much smaller than a 757" struck the Pentagon.

FACT: Some windows near the impact area did indeed survive the crash. But that's what the windows were supposed to do--they're blast-resistant.

"A blast-resistant window must be designed to resist a force significantly higher than a hurricane that's hitting instantaneously," says Ken Hays, executive vice president of Masonry Arts, the Bessemer, Ala., company that designed, manufactured and installed the Pentagon windows. Some were knocked out of the walls by the crash and the outer ring's later collapse. "They were not designed to receive wracking seismic force," Hays notes. "They were designed to take in inward pressure from a blast event, which apparently they did: [Before the collapse] the blinds were still stacked neatly behind the window glass."


Flight 77 Debris
CLAIM: Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?"

FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"
 
Grantedly that fact that Kilsheimer (being a blast expert) spits such **** such as this. The fact that he says he held actually body parts is a little shaky if you take into account the massive explosion from the blast would have probably left no body parts to be seen. Also, after a blast the fact that you could see a mark of a plane wing is a little BS. If anything, I believe it all but the retard at the end.
 
jeesus your insane muffin calm down
you dont have to like me because you think im wrong and your right sorry..
but you also need to do some research on the new world order theory and how there are alot of proven facts that our government is contributing to it happening
all of the events leading to 911, 911 itself, and the war going on in the middle east is just the begining and im not saying the whole new world order thing is true either cuz i know your gonna be a psycho and post some huge ass thing back just like you just did (i bet your a bush suporter lol) and thoes facts you just said there could still easily be apart of a cover up
oh and that highway that wasnt even 200 yards from the building how would a plane going 400 mph clear the highway and be 2 feet off of the ground with some RETARD who couldnt even fly in the first place??


**** all yall that wasnt a plane sorry
im with noobus canada has free healthcare and pot is tollerated what more could you ask for
 
also if a camera is pointed to shoot a license plate it would also have some sort of a shot of the background and the sorounding area not all gas stations would have 1 camera for every pump especially a gas station that only served special government officials??

the same with outdoor hotell camera that was on the roof what do u think it was for shooting close ups of models or looking down girls shirts??? i dont think it probably showed what im guessing maybie their parking lot? or something to that effect wich would show a pretty large area with alot of stuff in the background and oh what about the camera on the highway??? hmm wierd.. and why doesnt the "aircraft" look like a plane in the pentagon video and what happened to the wings the wingspan was wider than the visible damage on the building on and the tail rudder?? i think it dicintigraded by the power of god or maybe uh missiles dont have tail rudders hmmmmmm wierd
 
oh no you di' 'int, i can sense the anger already muffin has. you just released the beast .... i dont think that was wise, he will crush your silly argument into little missile debris and that will just be the beginning.
 
finally an insightful topic has been added to this forum...i cant think of **** to say on it
meh....lets give it a whirl...if the 9/11 conspirators couldve thought up a better sto...NAH **** IT!!!
SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM!!!
lol :D
 
Roflz, I'll get back to you on this one because there is quite alot I can type about it. I will tell you though I am not Pro nor anti Bush.
 
Back
Top