Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shouldn't we have a vote? I think u should make a separate thread with a poll, me or him, I think it's only fair, so other people can vote, please ustulo?thee_pro has accepted his nomination and is now the Head Guard of WoodKeep.
New thread would never be needed, and thee_pro is one of the very most trusted and well-liked people on the entire server.Shouldn't we have a vote? I think u should make a separate thread with a poll, me or him, I think it's only fair, so other people can vote, please ustulo?
I have been emphasizing this for awhile now. Is Woodkeep going to be a Nordic kind of place? If so, I would rather have no piston gates and all redstone contraptions should be underground. Also, we want this place nice AND efficient because nobody wants to live in a town that is either ugly or does not get anything done. Also, it was not a hotel, it was an inn.
The Nordic theme is rather loose, your house will be just fine!I do not believe my house design would fit in with a Nordic design theme, would I have to build near the town rather than in it at this rate?
I do agree with Zach on this one, even though I'd be honored to be the Head Guard, it seems selfish to take it from someone who has had prior relations with Woodkeep without the overall consensus of the town residents and higherups. But if it does come down to me getting it, Zach just know you will have an entirely clean slate in my eyes, I would not judge you by past behaviors. If you were to be one of my guardsmen, follow rules and any instructions given and you'll do fine. But dont disobey orders and do something of your own that you may believe is benefitting the town without asking first.Since pyro is mayor I think he should decide
I think we can both be co-head guards, can we both agree to co-head guard? I think it would be better having 2, incase one is offline, what do u say thee?I do agree with Zach on this one, even though I'd be honored to be the Head Guard, it seems selfish to take it from someone who has had prior relations with Woodkeep without the overall consensus of the town residents and higherups. But if it does come down to me getting it, Zach just know you will have an entirely clean slate in my eyes, I would not judge you by past behaviors. If you were to be one of my guardsmen, follow rules and any instructions given and you'll do fine. But dont disobey orders and do something of your own that you may believe is benefitting the town without asking first.
I've never heard of co-head guards before, and probably for good reasons as I can only guess that an argument over something guard related between the 2 in charge would just make the guard look bad. But one of us could become 2nd in command incase the head guard is away, that person would only have final say if and when head guard is away. But it isn't our call now, its up to Pyro and Ustulo to make the decision, along with anyone else who wants to throw their vote into the pot.I think we can both be co-head guards, can we both agree to co-head guard? I think it would be better having 2, incase one is offline, what do u say thee?
is this a good thing or a bad thing?I have just discovered a flaw in the WorldGuard Constitution.
It does not mention town guard leaders.
Ok, I thought it would be good so we can have 2 of us decide over something incase one of us judges wrong, but 2nd in command sounds fineI've never heard of co-head guards before, and probably for good reasons as I can only guess that an argument over something guard related between the 2 in charge would just make the guard look bad. But one of us could become 2nd in command incase the head guard is away, that person would only have final say if and when head guard is away. But it isn't our call now, its up to Pyro and Ustulo to make the decision, along with anyone else who wants to throw their vote into the pot.
is this a good thing or a bad thing?
cant tell
I don't even know what this thread is about but for some reason I posted on it
Why it bad?Bad.
Why it bad?
I'm not saying only the head guard would have any say. Basically, if a lower ranking officer comes up with an "improvement" they believe would benefit the guard or the town then they will tell the Head Guard, the Head Guard will then be tasked with figuring out if it will actually be beneficial. He will make any adjustments to the idea that he personally believes needs to be changed and will run the idea back through the guard team in its revised state.Ok, I thought it would be good so we can have 2 of us decide over something incase one of us judges wrong, but 2nd in command sounds fine
You're so very welcome.Thanks for contributing to the thread, bro.